User agent detail

com.sdgtl.sectime version=1; model=HTC Sensation Z710a fingerPrint=voda-hutch_au/htc_pyramid/pyramid:2.3.4/GRJ22/157335.1:user/release-keys
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCSensation Z710a Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
com closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close HTCSensation Z710a fingerPrint=voda-hutch aumobile-browseryescloseclose0.19904 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
HTCSensation Z710asmartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close HTCSensation Z710acloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42609 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
HTCSensation Z710a fingerPrint=voda-hutch aumobile:featureyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:45 | by ThaDafinser