User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux mips; HbbTV/1.2.1 (PVR; jcom; WA-7000; 1.0.0; 1.0.0; ); ce-html/1.0) Presto/2.12.407 Version/12.50
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/other.yaml
Opera Devices 3.4 Presto 2.12.407jcomWA-7000television Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.50Presto 2.12Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.50closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18704 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.50Presto GNU/Linux LoeweSL150tv0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.2.1closeLinux jcomWA-7000closeclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.50Presto 2.12.407Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42008 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 3.4Presto 2.12.407 jcomWA-7000televisioncloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:44 | by ThaDafinser