User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows Mobile; Windows CE; Opera Mobi/KEN-85228; U; xx) Presto/2.4.13 Version/10.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsmobile.yaml
Opera Mobile 10.00Windows Mobile Presto 2.4.13mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 10.00Presto 2.2WinMobile Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 10.00closeWindows GenericWindows Mobile (Opera)mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18304 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 10.00Presto Windows CE yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 10.00closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 10.0closeWindows Mobile closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mobile 10.00closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.21004 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 10.0Presto 2.4.13Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41308 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 10.00Presto 2.4.13Windows Mobile mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.00closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mobile 10.00close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:44 | by ThaDafinser