User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.3; ASUS Transformer TF300TG Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/27.0.1453.90 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AsusTransformer TF300TG Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 27.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.026 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.90closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 27.0.1453.90closeAndroid 4.0.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.25905 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 27.0WebKit Android 4.0AsusTransformer TF300TGtabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.90closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 27.0.1453closeAndroid 4.0.3AsusTransformer TF300TGcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.10502 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 27.0.1453.90WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.3AsusAsus Transformer Pad TF300TGcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41108 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 27Blink Android 4.0.3AsusTransformer Pad 300tabletyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.90closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.09199 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:44 | by ThaDafinser