User agent detail

Opera/8.5 (GOGI; Linux armv5tejl; U) [DE] Archos A704WIFI/SW1.7.53
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/media/device-archos.yaml
Opera 8.5 Archos704 WiFimediayes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.041 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 8.5closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18504 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 8.5Presto GNU/Linux ArchosA704WIFIsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 8.5closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.5closeLinux ArchosA704WIFIcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 8.5closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 8.5 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42008 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 8.5 Archos704 WiFimediayescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 8.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l HTCMDA Vario VFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:43 | by ThaDafinser