User agent detail

SonyEricssonJ220c/R5H TelecaBrowser/4.08
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonJ220c Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 4.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.07199 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonJ220c R5Hcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo 4.08close Sony EricssonJ220cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19004 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Sony EricssonJ220cfeature phoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close SonyEricssonJ220ccloseclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Teleca-Obigo 4.08close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sony EricssonSony Ericsson J220ccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40708 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo 4.08 Sony EricssonJ220cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SonyEricssonJ220cFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.037 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:43 | by ThaDafinser