User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.76 Safari/537.36 Seznam.cz/1.3.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
Seznam Browser 1.3Win8.1 6.3unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Seznam Browser 1.3Blink Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop0.026 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.76closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.76closeWindows 6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.19804 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 41.0Blink Windows 8.1desktop0.013 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.76closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 41.0.2272closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.018 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.76closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.05101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.76WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.56711 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 41Blink Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.76closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 41.0.2272.76closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:43 | by ThaDafinser