User agent detail

Dillo/0.8.5-i18n-misc
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/unknown.yml
Dillo 0.8.5 Dillo Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dillo 0.8 Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Dillo 0.8.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Dillo 0.8.5-i18n-misccloseLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19304 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Dillo 0.8Dillo 0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dillo 0.8.5close closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Dillo 0.8.5-i18n-miscclose closecloseclosecloseclose0.08602 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Dillo 0.8.5 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40708 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dillo 0.8.5 closeclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:41 | by ThaDafinser