User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Danger hiptop 4.6; U; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050920
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
Gecko 1.7.12DangerHiptopmobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.7Gecko 1.7 Desktop0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront closeDangerOS DangerSidekick 4mobile-browseryescloseclose0.23905 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.7close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseclose0.024 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla 1.7.12close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08202 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.7.12Gecko 20050920 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40508 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko 1.7.12 DangerHiptopmobile:featureyescloseclose0.025 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close DangerSidekick 4Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:41 | by ThaDafinser