User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; 008/0.83; http://www.80legs.com/webcrawler.html;) Gecko/2008032620
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-317.php
yes80LegsBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yes80LegsBot/Crawler0.06199 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyes80legs/0.83 bclose0.21704 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyes008close0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyes008Crawler0.53911 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
80legs Web Crawler Gecko 2008032620 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.9782 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyes80legsclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:41 | by ThaDafinser