User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Fedora; Linux mips64; rv:41.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/41.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Firefox 41.0Fedora Gecko 41.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 41.0Gecko 41.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.09199 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 41.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 41.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.22304 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 41.0Gecko Fedora desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 41.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 41.0closeFedora closeclosecloseclose0.018 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 41.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 41.0Gecko 20100101Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.4891 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 41.0Gecko 41.0Fedora desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 41.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:41 | by ThaDafinser