User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Series40; Nokia202/20.28; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) Gecko/20100401 S40Ov
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia202 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.14798 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries40 NokiaAsha 202mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27105 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Gecko Symbian OS Series 40 Nokia202smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 20.28;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia 202closeNokia Series 40 Nokia202closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08202 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser Gecko 20100401NokiaOS NokiaNokia 202closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.53911 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko Series40 NokiaAsha 202mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:40 | by ThaDafinser