User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; LenovoA3300-H Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.122 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-525.php
Chrome 35.0Android 4.4unknown LenovoTAB A7-30 Wi-Fi + 3GTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.4LenovoTAB A7-30 Wi-Fi + 3GTabletyesyes0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.122closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.122closeAndroid 4.4.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.25905 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.4LenovoEverSmartsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.122closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 35.0.1916closeAndroid 4.4.2LenovoA3300-Hcloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.07401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.122WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.47409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 35Blink Android 4.4.2LenovoIdeaTab A3300tabletyescloseclose0.018 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.122closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 35closeAndroid 4.4LenovoA3300-HTabletyesyescloseclose0.04399 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:40 | by ThaDafinser