User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; ZP980 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/46.0.2490.76 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-851.php
Chrome 46.0Android 4.2unknown ZOPOZP980Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 46.0Blink Android 4.2ZOPOZP980Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 46.0.2490.76closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 46.0.2490.76closeAndroid 4.2.2ZOPOZP980mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26805 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 46.0Blink Android 4.2ZopoZP980smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 46.0.2490.76closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 46.0.2490closeAndroid 4.2.2ZopoZP980closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.08802 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 46.0.2490.76WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41708 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 46Blink Android 4.2.2ZopoZP980mobile:smartyescloseclose0.036 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 46.0.2490.76closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2ZOPOZP980Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.041 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:39 | by ThaDafinser