User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.2; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.0450
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
IE 8.0WinXP 5.24.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 8.0Trident 4.0WinXP 5.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 8.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 8.0closeWindows 5.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.19208 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident Windows Server 2003desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 8.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 8.0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 8.0closeWindows Server 2003 closecloseclosecloseclose0.05302 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident 4.0Windows Windows NT 5.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41317 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident 4.0Windows Server 2003desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 8.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 8(Compatibility View)closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:39 | by ThaDafinser