User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.3; AQUILA 080-1008 Build/ICS.g12refM805CMX.20120925) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36 OPR/15.0.1162.61647
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
CmxAQUILA 080-1008 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 15.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 15.0.1162.61647closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 15.0.1162.61647closeAndroid 4.0.3GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.2551 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 15.0Blink Android 4.0yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 15.0.1162.61647closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 15.0.1162closeAndroid 4.0.3CmxAQUILA 080-1008closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.06303 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 15.0.1162.61647WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44318 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 15.0Blink Android 4.0.3CMXAquila 080-1008tabletyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 15.0.1162.61647closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.08699 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:39 | by ThaDafinser