User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100215 Solaris/10.1 (GNU) Superswan/3.5.8 (Byte/me)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Solaris 10.1 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.9Gecko 1.9Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.07799 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:1.9.1.8closeSolaris desktop-browsercloseclose0.19408 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Solaris 10.1desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.9closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla 1.9.1.8closeGNU closecloseclosecloseclose0.14306 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.9.1.8Gecko 20100215Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44118 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko 1.9.1Linux desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:38 | by ThaDafinser