User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; thl T6S Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/39.0.2171.93 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-563.php
Chrome 39.0Android 4.4unknown ThLT6SMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 39.0Blink Android 4.4ThLT6SMobile Phoneyesyes0.039 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 39.0.2171.93closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 39.0.2171.93closeAndroid 4.4.2ThLT6Smobile-browseryescloseclose0.26911 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 39.0Blink Android 4.4ThLT6Ssmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 39.0.2171.93closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 39.0.2171closeAndroid 4.4.2thl T6Scloseclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.07503 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 39.0.2171.93WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41116 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 39Blink Android 4.4.2THLT6Smobile:smartyescloseclose0.039 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 39.0.2171.93closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 39closeAndroid 4.4ThLT6SSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.052 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:38 | by ThaDafinser