User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; PMP5580C Build/IMM76I) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.133 Safari/535.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PrestigioPMP5580C Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.045 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeAndroid 4.0.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.2581 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.0PrestigioPMP5580Ctabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0.1025closeAndroid 4.0.4PrestigioPMP5580Ccloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.06703 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.133WebKit 535.19Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41116 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19Android 4.0.4PrestigioMultipad 5580 Primetabletyescloseclose0.035 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0PrestigioPMP5580CTabletyesyescloseclose0.21498 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:38 | by ThaDafinser