User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_8) AppleWebKit/534.55.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1.5 Safari/534.55.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-safari.yaml
Safari 5.1.5Mac OS X 10.6Webkit 534.55.3desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 5.1WebKit MacOSX 10.6AppleMacintoshDesktop0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 5.1.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 5.1.5closeOS X 10.6.8desktop-browsercloseclose0.18808 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 5.1WebKit Mac 10.6desktop0.017 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.1.5closeOS X 10.6.8closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 5.1.5closeMac OS X 10.6.8closeclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.1.5closeOS X 10.6.8closecloseclosecloseclose0.08003 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 5.1.5WebKit 534.55.3Mac OS X 10.6.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41116 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari 5.1.5Webkit 534.55.3Mac OS X 10.6desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.1.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 5.1.3closeMac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:38 | by ThaDafinser