User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; OpenBSD amd64; rv:33.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/33.0 SeaMonkey/2.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-seamonkey.yaml
SeaMonkey 2.30OpenBSD Gecko 33.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 33.0Gecko 33.0OpenBSD Desktop0.10599 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 33.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
SeaMonkey 2.30closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.18507 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SeaMonkey 2.30Gecko OpenBSD desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
SeaMonkey 2.30closeOpenBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 2.30closeOpenBSD closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
SeaMonkey 2.30closeOpenBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.18007 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Seamonkey 2.30Gecko 20100101OpenBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40816 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SeaMonkey 2.30Gecko 33.0OpenBSD desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 33.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 33.0closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:38 | by ThaDafinser