User agent detail

Spyglass_Mosaic/2.10 Win32 TGV/2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-mosaic.yaml
Spyglass Mosaic 2.10 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Spyglass closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Spyglass Mosaic 2.10closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.19108 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows 95desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 95 closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mosaic 2.10 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.61124 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Spyglass Mosaic 2.10 Windows desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:37 | by ThaDafinser