User agent detail

MOT-Unx/0B.D1.1FR MIB/2.2.1 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaUnx Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2 MotorolaUnxMobile Phoneyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-Unx 0B.D1.1FRcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2.1close Motorolamobile-browseryescloseclose0.23109 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
MotorolaUnxsmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaUnxcloseclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MIB 2.2.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05202 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront NX closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42917 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2.1 MotorolaUnxmobile:featureyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close MotorolaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:37 | by ThaDafinser