User agent detail

RhythmDisplayAdSDK-E-Android HTC_Flyer_P512_NA-3.2.1-43074
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCFlyer_P512_NA-3.2.1-43074 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
RhythmDisplayAdSDK-E-Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid HTCFlyermobile-browseryescloseclose0.38415 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
HTCFlyer P512 NA-3smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid HTCFlyer_P512_NA-3.2.1-43074closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.52021 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android HTCFlyertabletyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.06699 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:36 | by ThaDafinser