User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; zh-CN; rv:1.9.2.8;baidu Transcoder) Gecko/20100722 Firefox/3.6.8 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/Parser/fixtures/bots.yml
Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.6Gecko 1.9.2WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.13699 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.6.8closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.6.8closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.27811 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesBaidu SpiderSearch bot0.001 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.6.8closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.6.8closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.6.8closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.10404 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.6.8Gecko 20100722Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42317 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.6.8Gecko 1.9.2Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.6.8closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:36 | by ThaDafinser