User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; U; Webpositive/533.4; Haiku) AppleWebkit/533.4 (KHTML, like gecko) Chrome/5.0.375.55 Safari/533.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
WebPositive Haiku OS WebKit desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 5.0.375.55closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 5.0.375.55close desktop-browsercloseclose0.23109 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
WebPositive WebKit Haiku OS desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 5.0.375.55close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 5.0.375close closeclosecloseclose0.027 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 5.0.375.55closeHaiku closecloseclosecloseclose0.11104 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 5.0.375.55WebKit 533.4 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44218 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 5Webkit 533.4Haiku desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 5.0.375.55closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 5.0.375.99closeMac OS X 10.6.2Desktopcloseclose0.11499 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:36 | by ThaDafinser