User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/125.5.7 (KHTML, like Gecko) SunriseBrowser/0.833
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Sunrise 0.833Mac WebKit desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 125.5.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Sunrise 0.833closeOS X desktop-browsercloseclose1.36655 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Sunrise 0.833WebKit Mac desktop0.014 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
AppleMail 125.5.7closeMac OS X closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Sunrise 0.833closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.08203 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 125.5.7Mac OS X closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42617 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 125.5.7OS X desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:35 | by ThaDafinser