User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.1; AT703 Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.89 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet-1.yml
Chrome 40.0.2214.89Android 4.2.1Blink ToshibaRegza AT703tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 40.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.18698 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.89closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.89closeAndroid 4.2.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.26511 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 40.0Blink Android 4.2ToshibaRegza AT703tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.89closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 40.0.2214closeAndroid 4.2.1ToshibaAT703closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05302 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.89WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42017 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 40Blink Android 4.2.1ToshibaRegza AT703tabletyescloseclose0.047 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.89closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:35 | by ThaDafinser