User agent detail

SAMSUNG-S9402/S9402XAHK2 NetFront/3.4 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungS9402 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 3.4NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.041 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-S9402 S9402XAHK2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 3.4closeJVM SamsungS9402mobile-browseryescloseclose0.48219 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 3.4NetFront SamsungS9402smartphoneyes0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 3.4close SamsungS9402closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
NetFront 3.4close closecloseclosecloseclose0.04902 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41417 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 3.4 SamsungS9402mobile:featureyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
NetFront 3.4close SamsungS9402Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:34 | by ThaDafinser