User agent detail

LG-MG130 UP.Browser/6.2.3 GUI MMP/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGMG130 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA LGMG130Mobile Phoneyes0.026 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-MG130 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3close LGMG130mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20108 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 LGMG130smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.2.3close LGMG130closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3 LGLGMG130closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.44618 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 LGMG130mobile:featureyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close LGMG130Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:34 | by ThaDafinser