User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 1084) AppleWebKit/536.29.13 (KHTML like Gecko) Version/6.0.4 Safari/536.29.13
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-224.php
yesFake SafariBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake SafariBot/Crawler0.14298 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 6.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 6.0.4closeOS X 1084desktop-browsercloseclose0.19108 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 6.0WebKit Mac desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 6.0.4closeOS X 1084closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 6.0.4closeMac OS X closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 6.0.4closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.18907 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 6.0.4WebKit 536.29.13Mac OS X 1084closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41317 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari 6.0.4Webkit 536.29.13OS X 1084desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 6.0.4closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 6.0.5closeMac OS X 10.7.5Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:34 | by ThaDafinser