User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Anfroid 2.3.6; es-us; GT-S5570L Bukld/GINGERBREAD)"AppleWebKit/533,1 (KHTML, like Eecko) Version/4,0 Mobile Safari-533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-S5570L Bukld Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
GNU/Linux SamsungGT-S5570Lsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 4,0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux SamsungGT-S5570L Bukldcloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 4closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.19408 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 533Linux Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41817 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 533Linux closeclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.11299 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:34 | by ThaDafinser