User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (BREW; Opera Mini/5.0/27.2338; U; en) Presto/2.8.119 240X320 Samsung SCH-U38025
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSCH-U38025 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 5.0Presto 2.2Brew 2.0Mobile Deviceyes0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.80closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 5.0close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.35914 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 5.0Presto Brew SamsungSCH-U38025smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 5.0close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 5.0closeBREW SamsungSCH-U38025closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05302 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 5.0Presto 2.8.119 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42617 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 5.0Presto 2.8.119Brew SamsungSCH-U38025mobile:featureyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.80closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 5.0close SamsungSCH-U660Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:33 | by ThaDafinser