User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.57 Safari/537.36 OPR/16.0.1196.62
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-011.php
Opera 16.0Win8 6.2unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 16.0Blink Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 16.0.1196.62closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 16.0.1196.62closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.23009 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 16.0Blink Windows 8desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 16.0.1196.62closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 16.0.1196closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.57closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.08703 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 16.0.1196.62WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41717 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 16.0Blink Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 16.0.1196.62closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 16.0.1196.45closeMac OS X 10.9.0Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:33 | by ThaDafinser