User agent detail

Instagram 5.1.3 Android (19/4.4.2; 480dpi; 1080x1920; samsung; SM-N900; ha3g; universal5420; en_GB)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSM-N900 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Instagram App WebKit Android AppleMobile Deviceyesyes0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Instagram closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid Samsung; SM-N900; ha3g; universal5420; enmobile-browseryescloseclose0.28111 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android SamsungGALAXY Note 3phabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid SamsungSM-N900closeclosecloseclose0.14399 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40616 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android Samsung; SM-N900; ha3g; universal5420; enmobile:smartyescloseclose0.11101 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.05399 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:32 | by ThaDafinser