User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; en-us; KFSOWI Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/3.7 Safari/535.19 Silk-Accelerated=true
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AmazonKindle Fire HD 7" WiFi Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Silk 3.7WebKit Android AmazonKindle Fire HD 7Tabletyesyes0.22298 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 3.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 535.19closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.26411 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Silk 3.7Blink Android AmazonKindle Fire HD 7" WiFitabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 3.7closeAndroid AmazonKindle Fire HD 7" WiFicloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.12005 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Silk 3.7WebKit 535.19Fire OS AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41016 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Silk 3.7Webkit 535.19FireOS 3AmazonKindle Fire HD (2013)tabletyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Amazon Silk Browser 3.1closeAndroid AmazonKFSOWITabletyesyescloseclose0.022 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:32 | by ThaDafinser