User agent detail

SonyEricssonJ108i/R7EA Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UNTRUSTED/1.0 UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; xx; SonyEricssonJ108i) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.4.0.342 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
UC Browser 9.4 Gecko Sony EricssonCedarmobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneral CrawlersBot/Crawler0.04799 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonJ108i R7EAcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19108 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.4 Sony EricssonCedarfeature phoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.4.0close SonyEricssonJ108icloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.12605 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.4.0.342 Sony EricssonSony Ericsson J108icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41116 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.4Gecko Sony EricssonCedarmobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SonyEricssonJ108iFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:32 | by ThaDafinser