User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/pc_windows.yaml
UNKNOWN Windows XP NT 5.1 pc Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Thunderbird 8.0Gecko 8.0WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.06799 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Thunderbird 8.0closeWindows 5.1email-clientcloseclose0.19908 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Thunderbird 8.0 Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 8.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Thunderbird 8.0closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.07003 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 8.0Gecko 20111105Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41216 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Thunderbird 8.0Gecko 8.0Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:32 | by ThaDafinser