User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.0; Edition Next) Presto/2.12 Version/12.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Opera Next 12.10Windows VistaPresto desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.10Presto 2.12WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.10closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.2511 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Next 12.10Presto Windows Vistadesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.10closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.10closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.10closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.06102 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.10Presto 2.12Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40916 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Next 12.10Presto 2.12Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.10closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:31 | by ThaDafinser