User agent detail

SonyEricssonJ200i/R101
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonJ200i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
SEMC SymbianOS SonyEricssonJ200iMobile Phoneyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonJ200i R101closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close Sony EricssonJ200imobile-browseryescloseclose0.18907 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Sony EricssonHazelfeature phoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SonyEricssonJ200icloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sony EricssonSony Ericsson J200icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41717 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Sony EricssonJ200imobile:featureyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SonyEricssonJ200iFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.04 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:31 | by ThaDafinser