User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; EBM727KC Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.166 Safari/535.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
YifangM727KC Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.0.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.28011 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.0tabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0.1025closeAndroid 4.0.4YifangM727KCcloseclosecloseclose0.026 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.12605 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166WebKit 535.19Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40916 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19Android 4.0.4EBM727KCtabletyescloseclose0.07601 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.06299 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:31 | by ThaDafinser