User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4 JetROM; Novo7Fire Build/ICS.Fire.20120916) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.166 Safari/535.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AinolNovo7Fire Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.10599 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid desktop-browsercloseclose0.2531 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.0AinolMID1125tabletyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0.1025closeAndroid 4.0.4AinolNovo7Firecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4 JetROMclosecloseclosecloseclose0.06302 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166WebKit 535.19Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.39716 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19Android 4.0.4AinovoNovo7 Firetabletyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 18closeAndroid 4.0AinolNovo7 FireTabletyesyescloseclose0.07699 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:31 | by ThaDafinser