User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 /
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
Firefox 29.0Win8 6.229.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 29.0Gecko 29.0Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:29.0closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.18107 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows 8desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla 29.0closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.05802 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 29.0Gecko 20100101Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40716 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko 29.0Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:30 | by ThaDafinser