User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Unknown; BSD Four) AppleWebKit/534.34 (KHTML, like Gecko) PhantomJS/1.9.2 Safari/534.34
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-539.php
PhantomJS 1.9BSD unknownunknown unknowngeneral DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
PhantomJS 1.9WebKit BSD Desktop0.06399 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.34closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 534.34close desktop-browsercloseclose0.2621 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit 0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
PhantomJS 1.9.2closeBSD closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.27711 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 534.34 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41217 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
PhantomJS 1.9.2Webkit 534.34 closeclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:30 | by ThaDafinser