User agent detail

Samsung-SPHM220 Polaris/5.0 MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSPHM220 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Polaris 5.0 Mobile Deviceyes0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Samsung-SPHM220 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Polaris 5.0closeJVM SamsungSPH M220mobile-browseryescloseclose2.35394 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Polaris 5.0 SamsungSPHM220smartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Polaris 5.0close SamsungSPHM220closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Polaris 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.33713 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Polaris 5.0 SamsungSPHM220 Polarismobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SamsungSPH M220Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.033 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:30 | by ThaDafinser