User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows Phone OS 7.0; Trident/3.1; IEMobile/ 7.0; WpsLondonTest; HTC; HD7 T9292)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-1.yml
Internet Explorer 7.0Windows Phone 7.0Trident HTCHD7 T9292smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 7.0Trident Win32 Windows DesktopDesktop0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 7.0closeWindows 7.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.19308 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 7.0Trident Windows Phone 7.0HTCHD7 T9292smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows Phone closeWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 7.0closeWindows Phone 7.0HTCHD7 T9292closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile 7.0closeWindows Phone OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.07903 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer Mobile Trident 3.1Windows Phone HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41216 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 7.0Trident 3.1Windows Phone 7.0HTCHD7mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile 7.0closeWindows Phone 7.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:29 | by ThaDafinser