User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US) AppleWebKit/532.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/4.1.249.1025 Safari/532.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
Dragon 4.1WinVista 6.0unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dragon 4.1WebKit WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.04 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 4.1.249.1025closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 4.1.249.1025closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.22109 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 4.1WebKit Windows Vistadesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 4.1.249.1025closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 4.1.249closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 4.1.249.1025closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.07603 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 4.1.249.1025WebKit 532.5Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41617 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 4.1Webkit 532.5Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 4.1.249.1025closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 4.1.249.1025closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:29 | by ThaDafinser