User agent detail

ICQ_Android/5.1 (Android; 15; 4.0.4; LG-P990-P99030a.1211302332; LG-P990; de-DE)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGP990-P99030a.1211302332 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
ICQ closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 5.1LGOptimus 2X Speedmobile-browseryescloseclose0.26311 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android LGP990smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 5.1LGP990-P99030a.1211302332closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android LGLGP990closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.51621 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 5.1LGOptimus 2X Speedmobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 44closeAndroid 5.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.06399 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:29 | by ThaDafinser