User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.4; en-us; HTC6435LVW 4G Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTC6435LVW 4G Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.4HTCHTC6435LVW 4Gmobile-browseryescloseclose0.2551 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0HTC6435LVWsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.4closeAndroid 4.0.4HTC6435LVW 4Gcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.18707 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.0.4HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.46418 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.0.4HTCDroid DNAmobile:smartyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0HTCHTC6435LVW 4GSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.08899 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:28 | by ThaDafinser