User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.4.4; zh-cn; HS-Hisense E621T Build/KVT49L) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone.yml
Android Browser Android 4.4.4WebKit HisenseE621Tsmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.4GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.2471 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.4HisenseE621Tsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.4.4closeAndroid 4.4.4HisenseHS-Hisense E621Tcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.10504 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41817 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 537.36Android 4.4.4HisenseE621Tmobile:smartyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.037 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:28 | by ThaDafinser